US-Backed Ukrainian Publication Texty Releases List of Network Opposing Support for Ukraine That Includes Trump, Ron Paul, Ron DeSantis, RFK Jr., Neo-Cons, Communists and African Socialists
Ukrainian publication Texty claims a vast network of hundreds of Americans and other public figures are connected in a conspiracy to prevent military aid to Ukraine based on social media posts.
The Liberty Report Discussed the US funded a Ukrainian outlet that released an “enemies list” in a recent article and Liberty Report episode. The list included prominent individuals, including multiple candidates in the 2024 US Presidential election (RFK Jr., DeSantis, Trump, Vivek):
Breakdown of the List
The “methodology” used by the outlet included considering sharing a social media post as evidence of being a “node” of a vast anti-Ukrainian Trump conspiracy. A “cabal” if you will. The outlet doesn’t provide citations for their research, such as archival links and screenshots of posts deemed to show someone was part of a shadowy kabal to undermine Ukraine. Most claims do not include sources validating the claim, there is no disclosure of the data sets used for the report, and it includes anti-American information that could be construed as an attempt to threaten American Presidential candidates.
The table listing the entries on the list indicates the report used Wikipedia as their source, as the only link provided in the table for additional information are each listed entries Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is edited by users and is not a verified source of information according to the online encyclopedia’s disclosure page. Since Wikipedia pages aren’t static, the information is subject to change and makes it impossible to know what content on Wikipedia the report is referencing. Additionally, the Wikipedia page could be edited and replaced with different information, such as changing the locations the listed entities to office parks in Kyiv.
The report includes a slew of “Pepe Silva” infographics alleging connections between anti war Libertarians, pro war neo-cons, Russian media outlets, and African Socialists:
The report provides a table with 47 pages of individuals and organizations guilty of opposing US support for Ukraine. The report oddly claims that Ron Paul is a Donald Trump supporter and associates neo-conservatives like Trump and Koch with the political right (decentralized).
The report relies on subjective associations and false inferences to argue remotely connected people with very different and ideologies are actually nodes in a cabal trying to deprive Ukraine of American loans, money, and military aid. The report claims an expression of an opinion is proof of malice, expressing similar opinions as someone unrelated as proof of coordination, and largely just lists information from Wikipedia about social media posts, podcasts, and the spouses/social network of people and entities on the list. Essentially information an angry ex partner would post on Facebook to embarrass or cause harassment of their ex.
Report Confirms Russian Claims of US Funded Biological Labs in Ukraine
Texty provides a refutation of US-supported biological labs in Ukraine by citing the a US Embassy page with several agreements to assist with health infrastructure and services in Ukraine, a biological agreement between the US Department of Defense and Ukraine, and two broken links (the third and forth hyperlinks in the image below):
The first hyperlink in the section above directs to a US Embassy website:
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b94645b-7db8-4353-b162-cd712c2e0f08_1316x606.png)
Ironically, Texty provides evidence to support the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs claims that Russia obtained evidence of biological cooperation between the US and Ukraine that had the capabilities to create offensive weapons. For example, one biological agreement between the Ukraine and U.S. requires Ukraine to provide “copies of dangerous pathogen strains collected in Ukraine for cooperative biological research in the centralized laboratories in the Ukraine and Department of Defense designated labs in the United States.” This agreement makes it sound as if deadly pathogens from Ukraine were studied and transported outside of Ukraine instead of destroyed. The clause explicitly discusses moving deadly pathogens to the United States and studying them inside of Ukraine and the United States, posing a threat to Americans.
The deadly pathogens themselves can be biological weapons if released unaltered. Ie, the deadly pathogens don’t need manipulated or engineered to function as a weapon, as even an accidental exposure during transport or experimentation could cause significant death.
And if these pathogens were a threat when possessed by the USSR, is that not an indication they have offensive capabilities? Otherwise the US would have no justification to enter agreements to protect or study the deadly pathogens. Ie, the cause for the biological agreements is an admission by the United States and Ukraine that the deadly pathogens referred to in the agreement are, in fact, biological weapons. Otherwise they would not to be “safeguarded” from evildoers. The failure to destroy the deadly pathogens is an indication of bad faith by the US and Ukraine, as they already admitted the reason they need to posses the pathogens is to keep them safe from bad actors, meaning the pathogens are a weapon.
Western media outlet The Guardian admitted that the US supported biological laboratories, research, and programs in Ukraine while denying the labs developed biological weapons. However, this premise (the biological laboratories are defensive and not offensive) is contradicted when the outlet claimed the labs could be a threat if Russia gained control of them. If the US and Ukraine believe it is dangerous for Russia to control the biological labs in Ukraine, then this implies something involving the biological labs is a threat. And if the US and Ukraine don’t want their neighbor to possess biological labs that aren’t used to develop, store, or research offensive biological capabilities in any way, then why is it dangerous for Russia to possess these same biological labs? If the labs are no threat to Russia prior to the invasion, then why would they be a threat to Ukraine or the US after the invasion?
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1a101361-c897-4681-8c30-319d4234f9b8_651x542.png)
The full agreement pictured above:
The Full Report
The PDFs of the report and the “common narratives” associated with those on the list that are used to oppose US support and aid to Ukraine: